You can take the boy out of the carnival but you can't take the carny out of the boy.
Images and text relating (at times) to my painting practice.
You can take the boy out of the carnival but you can't take the carny out of the boy.

“How wonderful that we have met with paradox. Now we have some hope of making progress.”
-- Niels Bohr
Unlike my (piss-taking) academic-essay-type-title - followed by obligatory quote - human power relationships cannot be separated out with a simple (subordinating) semi-colon. That particular task takes an artist.
So, unless you relish the rictus-restricted prose of academics you’d best get reports, of power and control, from paintings, songs, novels, or (hell) even a bunch of leotard-clad ‘modern-dancers’….. than from some thin-aired theory-meister.
Good films (or good film-scenes in otherwise bad movies) are damn-close-to ectypal of the perpetually unfixed fact(s) of human nature. Films that toy mercilessly with conventional notions of power and its’ shifty asymmetry, are (at least to me) the most life-like. And,consequently, the most immersive.
Here’s a couple of favorite scenes, that more than fit the bill……………
True Romance, 1993
with Christopher Walken & Dennis Hopper
Written by Quentin Tarention
Directed by Tony Scott
Last Tango in Paris, 1972
Written and Directed by Bernardo Bertolucci




Home from Auckland, where Bridget McIntosh & Georgina Ralston of Bath Street hosted
Samuel Beckett writes - "nothing is funnier than unhappiness."
Artists and cartoon characters concur.
There's nothing much funnier than an artist's visually apparent unhappiness with whatever preceded his or her own production.
Art more often than not issues convulsively from its maker's unhappiness at having internalized and (of course) acted upon Marx's adversarial dictum "I am nothing and should be everything."
The entertainment (and the rub) lies in the historical reality that if an artist hopes to displace an existent 'everything' with his or her up-and-coming 'nothing' then there had better be at least a passing reference to whatever (of significance) came before.
Art about art is envy masquerading as influence and homage. Often taking the form of a sort of Oliver Hardy-esque dyspeptic-pot-shot at prominent (and putatively obstructionist) work that preceded (but won't make way for) puppyish, one-upping, commentators.
Have empathy for young artists who now must model and test their work against (and after) ready-to-hand targets - such as Dan Arps, Simon Denny, Dane Mitchell, Eve Armstrong, Robert Hood and Tahi Moore - artists who incarnate the very Destruktion the young wish to visit upon them.
Campbell Patterson’s sultana bran and spit works are emblematic (or symptomatic) of the aforementioned envy-crisis. And only (just manages to) be functionally funny by literally throwing in the towel.
Now, is there anything unhappier than that?




Lucian Freud & Brendan Behan
It has been my lifelong habit to imaginatively reduce the creation to ur-categories - that which naturally occurs and that which is man-made.
Artworks are man-made objects that historically aspired to the look of naturally occurring things. And although mimesis (imitation of nature) is no longer the exclusive aim of artworks, objects continue to be forwarded by artists, and received by the public, as tangible incarnations of (intangible) natural forces. Forces majueure, such as introspection & speculation.
Man-made things are inherently ‘dumb’ and inanimate. Yet artists labor to make things that speak and, in so doing, move the viewer.
Great artworks that somehow manage to speak compellingly (to their time and beyond) are linguistically apotheosized as moving and ‘immortal’.
Painter Speaks, as a project, settles for a more modest and mortal (secular) level of ambition. These paintings’ potential for movement, if any, could be fairly characterized as suggesting a sort of painterly (hall of mirrors) infinite-regress.
The project relies (obviously) on a consciously redundant correlation of stylized landscape (painting as imitation of nature) and stylized portraiture (painting as imitation of life).
The portraits, in these cases, are painted transcription of a sculpturally simulated wooden ‘human-like’ ventriloquist’s-head. A head traditionally fashioned to slavishly entertain and articulate its author’s delegated voice.
PAINTER SPEAKS
Opens at Suite Gallery, Wellington on 22 September 2011.
AN OPEN LETTER
Good Day Dr. Carr, et al. -
I’ve taken the liberty of sending you this link http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2001/0205.florida.html in the unlikely event that you haven’t yet read Richard Florida’s game changing books.
I once taught at Carnegie Mellon – a renowned research university in the city-of-comparison, employed by Mr. Florida (in the linked article) to illustrate his case about and for the ‘creative classes’. I can affirm, from experience, that Mr. Florida’s observations about Pittsburgh (and aspiring municipalities like, and unlike, it) are right ‘on the money’.
Well before Florida’s books were penned I had the historically serendipitous privilege of hanging out in Palo Alto with a number of the seminal figures who originated the knowledge and wealth creating digital revolution. A now-international phenomenon which had its beginnings on San Francisco Bay peninsula and later moved north to San Francisco and south to the Silicon Valley.
The scene I was privy to (and the intellectual ecosystem wherein these founding-father ‘digirati’ thrived) was richly populated with creative types - visual artists, writers, chorographers, dramaturges and musicians and, of course, the brilliantly science minded. In fact the science and art ‘types’ were, at the time, stylistically indistinguishable from one another. The (informal) interpersonal exchange I witnessed, between science-creators and fine art creators, was highly valued in both allied camps - and shaped thinking on both sides.
I’m of a mind that without this heady and creatively volatile social brew there would have been a much slower ‘arriving-at’ what is now (arguably) the largest international driver of knowledge and treasure.
If, as you claim, the university truly aspires to be “- a strong, comprehensive, research-intensive, - university in this city.” then the university, as a long-time incubator and attractor of the ‘creative classes’, should look – out of self-interest - to ways & means of retaining, attracting and supporting the fine arts (equally) alongside the institution’s demonstrated and growing support of the hard sciences. Art and science together are, and will be, the sparking catalyst of a renewed city and University.
Sincerely
Roger Boyce
Painter
School of Fine Arts
Some songs displace familiarity with and prior knowledge of singing and songs. Enabling attentive listeners to slip blessedly free of supposition about what the act of singing is. Or isn’t.
Given the right vehicle great artists, such as Sinatra, can trip one’s reset button – dumping all dulling foreknowledge of a particular form and inducing (to paraphrase Beatnik forefather Lawrence Ferlinghetti) a ‘rebirth of wonder’.
As a kid I was vaguely aware of Sinatra the controversial celebrity, but was abjectly ignorant of what he'd done to and for male vocals - moving the form from standard-issue big band legato crooning to a heartbeat inflected and poetic conversational style.
It took the 1960's and the emergence of independent FM radio programming to hip me to what his voice could do - given the right material, arrangements and accompanists.
I first heard Sinatra - in a receptive frame of mind - one late evening while listening to Lights Out with Vacco. Vacco was a Hispanic sounding hipster who played an incredibly eclectic mix of sounds to a mostly stoned radio audience.
One night this particular music programmer prefaced something he was about to play with a cautionary warning about 'dismissal, prior to investigation'...and then proceeded to spin a smart selection of Frank Sinatra tunes from the singer's peerless Capitol years.
The few scattered groans in that night's room of long-haired listeners - when Sinatra's name was unexpectedly announced by the DJ - were soon silenced by a sound no one present had heretofore really heard.
I ran out the next day and bought the album Only the Lonely, for its title track. I've been listening ever since.
Only the Lonely
written by Sammy Cahn, Jimmy Van Heusen
Frank Sinatra, Capital Records 1958
Change Partners (a gem written by Irving Berlin) performed with Antonio Carlos Jobim.
Here Sinatra's voice has begun to thicken with age and lose some of its 'ping'. But he's so masterfully in command of his instrument as to make that fact irrelevant.

In a recent letter to The Press, National MP Nicky Wagner crowed that Christchurch’s arts are alive and well. She cited two examples = The Arts & Industry SCAPE Biennial and The Christchurch Arts Festival … coming soon to a suburb near you.
If their history is anything to go by, the well-funded Biennial and the Festival will both be importing the great majority of art and artists featured in their (international, Lol) events. There will, no doubt, be an invited token-local or two but they’ll be veritable (and properly grateful) populist skunks at what are, for the most part, elitist garden parties.
Hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of public and private cultural-dollars siphoned/diverted into Arts & Industry and The Arts Festival will go toward hotel rooms, restaurant meals, flights, freight forwarding and production costs – not to mention fully-salaried (non-artist) bureaucrats.
Consider the carbon footprint of these events and the heavy financial footprint left on the still-shaky back of a region-wide arts budget. A budget better dedicated to retaining the region's art practitioners – artists, some of whom are making a last-ditch attempts to stay in a town that apparently doesn’t care (except in lip-service) whether they do or not. As I’m wont to say, in a late capitalist society – if you really love me then write me a check.
Meanwhile, while festivals and biennials churn - scores of unsalaried local art practitioners will be studio-less or laboring in unheated and unventilated provisional spaces. Many, who’ve come to their senses, will be leaving town for good. Meanwhile, while festivals and biennials $burn$ – unfunded, scrappy and inventive provisional spaces (rooms for exhibition and performance) will continue to pop up around town. And, underwritten solely by sweat equity and the skinny bank balances of their originators they will attract and reward (real art audiences) on any given weekend.
How many worthy home-grown artists and artist-initiated spaces could be funded with the truly-large amounts lavished on so-called arts festivals and biennials? How many regional artists could be studio(ed), exhibited, their work temporarily underwritten by (say) just the printing/publicity budgets of the so-called arts festival and biennial?
With the Christchurch Art Gallery and most dealer galleries in the city shuttered for the foreseeable future it’s abominable to fund, support, import art and artists (from intact art communities elsewhere) plop them haplessly down in the middle of the city-and-arts-wreckage here, and pay them to do their thing in Christchurch while local practitioners struggle to survive and keep working…….on, CO2 producing, beans and lip-service.


Live-music-legend and NZ-musical-treasure Rick Bryant used to be a busy muso. The formidably gifted blues/soul shouter ambitiously fronted Wellington’s Windy City Strugglers, led his Jive Bombers, performed with Bruno Lawrence’s Blerta and conducted the Jubilation Gospel Choir. Bryant currently languishes in an Aotearoan prison-cell for dealing cannabis – selling pot, no doubt, in lieu of a day job. Being an artist rarely covers one’s monthly ‘nut’.
Seized along with contraband in Bryant’s flat was $4,000 cash - an amount just shy of the gormless (and shameless) NZ-on-Air $5,000 grant to Sir Michael Fay’s pap-singing daughter, Annabel Fay. Sir Fay – said to be worth over 700 million – reportedly flew NZ-on-Air exec Brendan Smyth and a perk-licking posse of radio-biz players to his Great Mercury Island holiday ‘manse’ as a way (one would suppose) of extravagantly saying merci’ for their imprimatur of the musically impaired Annabel.
Simon Sweetman broke this story, some time ago, but no one (in or out of govt) seems much concerned with this brazen conflict of private/public interest. But then again it was only five grand’s worth of public money and the private elite, at least in this case, splashed out a lot more than 5K as payback for the public credibility afforded his undistinguished offspring.
Popular anecdotes about Merchant Banker Fay (and partner) pocketing wealth through fancy, under-regulated, public-asset swapping and stories about how he was thereafter accused, by the New Zealand Securities Commission, of insider trading are oft told tales in my adopted country. So, I’ll not bother repeating them.
I will submit the opinion that the Great Mercury Island music junket was a sort of asset swap - a trifling slice of Sir Fay’s fat assets, traded for a relatively substantial (1/10th of a $50,000 public purse) suck-at-the-soul of New Zealand sonic culture.
The long run costs to a culture of supporting (with, what Dave Hickey refers to as, “stupid money”) the feeble ‘practice’ of an indistinguishably mediocre trustifarian like Ms. Fay, while spending public money to arrest, prosecute and incarcerate an artist of Mr. Bryant’s caliber is a case of chasing bad money with … uh, bad money.
No one’s saying that Bryant was ignorant of the risks (he’s a repeat offender) inherent in his side-job…and I doubt he’d complain over the inevitabilities he's currently suffering. And I’d guess he doesn’t know who Annabel Fay is, care what she sounds like, or is interested at all in my unauthorized use of his sad case to make my troublingly tenuous (and possibly specious) case about public and private patronage.
Folks in CCH who recently finagled CNZ administrative connivance in facilitating a kangaroo-style faux-art-community ‘election’ and who now, as a result, have their wagons neatly circled around a moldering heap of public funds – funds ostensibly earmarked for sustaining the post-quake arts (and artists) in Canterbury – operate from a similar position of entitlement….and thus inbred mediocrity. I’d hazard that such attitudes are born of the company one keeps - if one is a chronic courtier of the provincial elite then one might feel entitled by one's puppy-like proximity to private monetary power and its perks. I've never seen the AVC big dog (I make a ‘leetle’ joke here) hanging out at any of the art events I attend or sharing ideas (ideas, another micro-absurdity) with any artist I know. But I imagine that house-trained 'beast' can often be found regularly enjoying the Christchurch equivalent (another wee joke) of a junket to Great Mercury Island.
I know, I know that this post’s all over the map. It's the best I could do - given the circumstances. I’ll make the excuse that I’ve been painting hard over the past weeks and that I suffered the worst case of material (I’ll never-ever-ever purchase brand X oil-painting medium again, by g-d) failure in memory. Meaning two weeks worth of fairly accomplished paint passages ended up being scraped off (employing toxic solvents) onto the studio floor to salvage what was left of my undistinguished under-paintings.
I’ll conclude here by paraphrasing two salient quotes I can’t quite recall and am too weary to Google.
The artist is forced to sit on the doorstep of the rich. – Victor Hugo
And
Great poets die in steaming pots of shit. – Charles Bukowski

